, ,

Appeals Court Refuses to Block Trump Rule That Would Cut Planned Parenthood Funding

In a major setback for Planned Parenthood, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that a Trump ban on funding clinics that refer women to abortion providers can take effect while the court weighs the overall merits. Suggested Reading The Root 100 – 2021 The Root 100 – 2022 The Root 100 – 2023 Video will…

In a major setback for Planned Parenthood, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that a Trump ban on funding clinics that refer women to abortion providers can take effect while the court weighs the overall merits.

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Stefon Diggs and Cardi B Viral Boat Video Prompts Response from Patriots Coach
Stefon Diggs and Cardi B Viral Boat Video Prompts Response from Patriots Coach

Federal law has long banned use of federal funding to pay for abortions, but monies could still be provided to health providers like Planned Parenthood that might refer women to abortion providers as part of overall reproductive health services.

But, as the Washington Examiner explains, Donald Trumpโ€™s โ€œProtect Life Ruleโ€ โ€œwould prevent Title X family planning funding from going to abortion providers or to clinics that refer patients to abortion providers.โ€

Planned Parenthood and other pro-choice groups have been suing since March to stop the rule from taking effect, a rule it calls a โ€œgag rule,โ€ impacting lawful and medically necessary communication between women and their health providers.

But on Thursday, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decided that the rule can take effect while the full 11-judge panel deliberates about whether the rule ultimately is legal.

Reacting on Twitter, Dr. Leana Wen, president of Planned Parenthood, called the 9th Circuitโ€™s decision โ€œdevastatingโ€:

https://twitter.com/DrLeanaWen/status/1149378482750808065?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Planned Parenthood operates about 40 percent of all clinics in the nation operating with Title X funding, according to the Examiner. It has said it will not comply with the Trump rule and, according to the Los Angeles Times, faces a loss of nearly $60 million in federal funds each year.

โ€œTodayโ€™s court order completely disregards the irreparable harm the regulations pose to millions of patients,โ€ Julie Rabinovitz, president and CEO of Essential Access Health, another one of the challengers in the case, told the Times.

As the Times explains, the new rule:

requires recipients of family planning funds to refer pregnant women to a non-abortion prenatal care provider.

[...]

Under the rule, recipients of federal funds may give women a list of providers that includes doctors who perform abortions but may not direct them to those physicians.

The rule also requires providers to encourage patients to discuss their situation with their families and to tell single women about the benefits of abstinence.

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.